this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
11 points (82.4% liked)

AskHistorians

756 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbouBenAdhem 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Homosexuality in Rome was taboo, except as a form of domination between an owner and his slaves.

More precisely, homosexual sex was seen in two distinct roles (“top” and “bottom”), and only the latter was taboo.

[–] PP_BOY_ 2 points 2 months ago

Eh... yes and no. It's worth acknowledging that "Roman" is a pretty big block of culture to talk about so broadly, but there were definitely more social rules to (older) males' choice of male concubine than "to be the one who penetrates." Public homosexual relationships almost always came from a place of power first and romance second (if at all).