Asklemmy

44005 readers

669 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What discussion you know you are on the wrong side of? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

145 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Maybe you haven't been convinced by a good enough argument. Maybe you just don't want to admit you are wrong. Or maybe the chaos is the objective, but what are you knowingly on the wrong side of?

In my case: I don't think any games are obliged to offer an easy mode. If developers want to tailor a specific experience, they don't have to dilute it with easier or harder modes that aren't actually interesting and/or anything more than poorly done numbers adjustments. BUT I also know that for the people that need and want them, it helps a LOT. But I can't really accept making the game worse so that some people get to play it. They wouldn't actually be playing the same game after all...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] captainlezbian 1 points 2 days ago

I understand that, but I’ll also share a bit of unasked for wisdom that was difficult for me to learn: I’ve never been long term grateful that I dug my feet in to an emotional reaction. I agree with the angry people, even though I think they communicated it poorly.

In my country we have an organization called PFLAG, it began as an organization for parents and friends of queer people to organize for our rights. It offers a service I think is incredibly valuable, no judgement peer counseling for people struggling with a loved one coming out. Nobody ever will convince someone that it’s ok that their kid is queer quite as well as someone who once needed that same convincing. IDK, I’m just thinking that maybe we need to bring that attitude in more. Balances can be so hard to strike, especially after years of combatting bad faith arguers.