this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
357 points (97.1% liked)
Greentext
4594 readers
1304 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I completely agree with this, we've made everything disposable and thus removed intrinsic meaning in favour of space for projection, to make everything as lowest common denominator as possible.
Watched a poignant discussion between Anthony Fantano and F.D Signifier recently (link here for those interested) where they focused on the Right's media illiteracy (their co-opting of RAtM to fuel reactionary and regressive movements is an example which they dissected) and they hit upon an aspect which I found very relevant to this subject, namely that music had an almost completely different dynamic "back then."
What they point out is that, with the absence of Social Media and the internet still relatively in its infancy, music used to be more of an event and a social marker than it is now. Songs used to be packed with more and more specific meaning considering they had a much harder time at delivering the ideological payload to the masses, people used to form communities around the bands' messages, and through said communities the message was made entirely unambiguous - nobody in the 90s would have mistaken RAtM's almost Anarchic messaging for Right Wing chest pumping, for instance, as their message was solidified in culture by the very communities which formed around them.
My man!
Always and forever, Google can suck it big time.