this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
523 points (97.6% liked)

Not The Onion

12577 readers
1690 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grimy 26 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (19 children)

They are synonyms. Please don't make things up.

Edit: to all the knee-jerk downvoting. This is literally a quote from an article the user himself supplied as proof that there is a difference.

Unhoused is probably the most popular alternative to the word “homeless.” It’s undoubtedly the one I see most often recommended by advocates. But it doesn’t have a meaningful difference in connotation from the more common term, “homeless.”

It's literally just a pc synonym of homeless.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

@Grimy Believe it or not, different dialects may have different meanings for the same words.

[–] Grimy 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (5 children)

Yes, but academically and more broadly in society, homeless means unhoused (by broadly in society, I mean in the common language like how third world is a synonyms for developing country even though academically it means something else.)

Important to note that he said in the US, not his hometown dialect or something. It's a blanket statement that is completely wrong no matter how you look at it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 weeks ago

@Grimy You are relying on a rhetorical device called an essentialism: an assertion of fact without evidence, a claim asserted as established fact without supporting argument or proof. Put another way:

Things aren't true just because you say they are, no matter how sure you are.

Essentialism isn't merely poor forensics. It's very literally gotten millions of people killed.

We always want to make every effort to use good forensics in arguments.

I don't believe you actually KNOW the facts.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)