this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
1009 points (97.5% liked)

People Twitter

5299 readers
2508 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago (14 children)

Interesting that he phrased it as liberalism.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (12 children)

The American definition of Liberalism is the exact opposite of the original meaning, so maybe he was just being extra-oldschool?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (11 children)

What do you consider to be the original meaning?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Neo liberal / laissez-faire applies to both major parties in the USA.

Although, it's certainly becoming less so with the GOP than the Democrats. IE: bailouts for farmers affected by their own tariffs, mass deportations which will affect business, etc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, and what ideological branch does a right winger who doesn't follow liberalism fall under?

[–] LengAwaits 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is a "right winger" who doesn't follow liberalism even a "right winger" at all, insofar as the term is used in modern US politics? Considering that without the central bird of liberalism there wouldn't be a need for the division into right and left wing. Maybe I'm off the mark, though?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] LengAwaits 2 points 23 hours ago

Ooooh, it was a leading question. I gotcha.

I agree with you 100%.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)