this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
39 points (93.3% liked)

PC Gaming

8722 readers
944 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

It's not even really that bad: a new patch will force recompiling of the shaders in Fortnite, and by the time you hit the ground from the battle bus it's usually... fine?

Like, yes, it's a stuttery mess in the lobby and while landing, but who cares? That's not gameplay where it matters in the least what the pixel-peeping frametime stats say.

This kind of thing is why I've just stopped caring about product reviews. It's either pixel-peeping nonsense that nobody but the reviewer thinks is important, or it's nonsense like 'The new Gaming Blaster X 2000 Mega Pro! For $1499 it's the best thing since the last thing, you should buy it, recommended!' and you look at the benchmarks, and you see that last gen was 148 fps, and this thing is 158 fps on the minimums and like, who gives a shit.

You won't notice this if you're playing the game and not playing watch-a-stats-graph, and this has kinda become the norm for a few generations of reviews on everything.