this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
702 points (96.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9699 readers
1986 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
702
Wank tank confirmed (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by [email protected] to c/fuckcars
 

BTW the tank has a better forward view than the truck

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CheeseNoodle 4 points 3 days ago (4 children)

But which one gets better mileage?

[–] SirQuackTheDuck 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I actually wouldn't be too surprised if it was the tank.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's not the tank. They get less than one mile per gallon.

[–] SirQuackTheDuck 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I never really expected it to be the tank.

load more comments (2 replies)