this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)
Apple
17595 readers
58 users here now
Welcome
to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!
Rules:
- No NSFW Content
- No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
- No Ads / Spamming
Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread
Communities of Interest:
Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple
Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode
Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I agree. I love what USB-C can do, but it is NOT a secure or durable-feeling connector.
Yes! Every time I say this somebody shows up to comment on how USB C is the best and they use it for all their fastening.
Yes. I tow large granite boulders behind my truck using nothing but a USB-C connector
That’s why lightning cables were designed the way they were. The flat connector was made to break if there was too much strain so that the port wouldn’t come loose. The cable is more easily/cheaply replaceable than the port.
Lightning cables are actually backwards to what is desired:
In USB standards the part that wears out (the spring pins) are on the cable, and thus easily replaced. In lightning the wear piece is in the expensive device, the cable has no moving parts. Beyond that, lightning has exposed pins, kind of a bad idea.
Definitely better than micro B, but far inferior to USB C.
That is simply incorrect. In lightning the wearing part also was on the cable. Simply by it being a softer metal.