this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
1233 points (93.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

6483 readers
3831 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Carnelian 4 points 2 months ago (16 children)

We could dissect why "manly" translates to "being worthy of respect", but that's a tangent from your question.

I think this pretty much gets to the root of the friction I experience when this topic comes up. I wouldn’t mind digging into it.

You likely have already guessed that I would think of it this way, but isn’t it just that “good people are worthy of respect”? Because it seems to me like if you try hard to take care of your family and do right by others, you’re a good person deserving of respect.

You know what I mean? If there’s no need for the trait to be exclusively masculine, then why do we do it? Translate “manly” into “worthy of respect”, that is. Is there some benefit to thinking about it in terms of masculinity rather than just in terms of goodness?

However, the phrase "manly" is referring to societal measures

they should have favorable societal traits and behaviors

Also, I do acknowledge this side of things. I wrote some thoughts about it in a reply to another comment in this thread, if you want to check that out. It’s an important point, and I don’t want you to think i’m just ignoring it. In summary, I think it’s kind of a bummer if in the end, manliness is just a tradition people feel compelled to participate in

[–] partial_accumen 3 points 2 months ago (15 children)

You likely have already guessed that I would think of it this way, but isn’t it just that “good people are worthy of respect”? Because it seems to me like if you try hard to take care of your family and do right by others, you’re a good person deserving of respect.

You know what I mean? If there’s no need for the trait to be exclusively masculine, then why do we do it? Translate “manly” into “worthy of respect”, that is. Is there some benefit to thinking about it in terms of masculinity rather than just in terms of goodness?

You skipped the OTHER criteria I listed for being "manly" besides just "goodness", that being: for a person that identifies with the biological reproductive role of a male.

However, the phrase “manly” is referring to societal measures

they should have favorable societal traits and behaviors

Also, I do acknowledge this side of things. I wrote some thoughts about it in a reply to another comment in this thread, if you want to check that out. It’s an important point, and I don’t want you to think i’m just ignoring it. In summary, I think it’s kind of a bummer if in the end, manliness is just a tradition people feel compelled to participate in

I'm not sure, but I think you're hearing the "man" in "manly" and assuming the opposite would "woman", "gay", or "enby". Not the case. The opposite to "man" in this case is "boy".

We could dissect why “manly” translates to “being worthy of respect”, but that’s a tangent from your question.

I think this pretty much gets to the root of the friction I experience when this topic comes up. I wouldn’t mind digging into it.

Its the "man" vs "boy" part, as in, a sign of maturity, of coming of age where you stop being a young and selfish boy and can see where you are in the world and what responsibilities you have to yourself and those around you in society. Society has few expectations of responsibility for a "boy". Responsibilities with weight go to those with maturity. Mature boys being men. Even the phrase "man up" usually means "to stand up and face the challenge instead of shying away", or to take responsibility. A boy still be 40 years old if he doesn't take up his adult responsibilities. At 40 years old he still wouldn't be "manly".

If you are taking exception with these phrases being associated with "man", then your beef is really with the last 3000 or 4000 so years of history. The concepts of equality across genders and sexual orientation are relatively recent in the last 20-40 years. History doesn't stop being history simply because we've evolved beyond some of our worst parts of it. We carry baggage for awhile as our language evolves to match our new values. Expecting language to change on a dime isn't very realistic. We'll need a few generations to die off and take this language with them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (7 children)

~~man up~~ boss up, gender neutral.

[–] jumperalex 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

~~man up boss up~~ emotional-fortitude up, morer gender neutral.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] jumperalex 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're not wrong. But if you want to 1) eliminate any chance of assumed gender in "Boss" due to cultural history, and 2) have a little fun with moving the mark into the absurd, you'd appreciate what I'm saying.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It feels like emotion shaming. "Boys don't cry/big girls don't cry." Maybe that's why there are so many suicides, which I also think suicide shaming the victim is wrong. Shame the society/circumstances that led up to it, you know?

[–] jumperalex 2 points 2 months ago

Moving past the joke of de-gendering a gendered colloquialism; yes I do agree with you on both of your points.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)