A Comm for Historymemes

1434 readers

440 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.
No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.
Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.
Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

PugJesus

285

"Now, let's butcher each other's peasants again!" (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 days ago by PugJesus to c/historymemes

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PugJesus -5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It is not a connotation you have issue with it is the social acceptability,

And why is it socially unacceptable?

Because of the connotations.

Thanks for playing. Try not being a moron next time.

Like, fuck, it's not every day I get into an argument with someone who literally spells out why they're wrong, lmao. That's some next-level obliviousness.

[+] Cypher 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] PugJesus -4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The connotations are the same and you haven’t offered any fucking proof otherwise.

The connotations are the same

You really are just gonna go out here and make this claim, huh? lol

The social acceptability is different only because of how words fall in and out of favour in the lexicon you retard.

... and why do words fall in and out of favor, sweetie?

[+] Cypher 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] PugJesus -4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I never argued for the acceptability for either word you retard I only pointed out your hypocrisy.

I didn't say anything about acceptability in that comment, but thanks for proving that your reading comprehension is still at the same low level it was when you started this chain.

And thanks for not answering

… and why do words fall in and out of favor, sweetie?

I wonder if it's because you don't actually read the comments you respond to, or if you actually do know on some level that answering that question would torpedo your very basic and very stupid premise?