this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
40 points (91.7% liked)
Bicycling
2222 readers
15 users here now
A community for those who enjoy bicycling for any reason— utility, recreation, sport, or whatever!
Post your questions, experiences, knowledge, pictures, news, links, and (civil) rants.
Rules (to be added on an as-needed basis)
- Comments and posts should be respectful and productive.
- No ads or commercial spam, including linking to your own monetized content.
- Linked content should be as unburdened by ads and trackers as possible.
Welcome!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I know I'm late to the discussion, but I was experimenting with this recently so wanted to add my experience in the UK.
I'm on a gravel bike and I'm a beginner cyclist although I've done lots of walking/hiking in the past so I'm used to being out and about. It's currently autumn so relatively wet.
With the default option (balanced), I get sent down a mix of minor country roads (good) and some paths that are in theory bridleways but in practice they are extremely rutted footpaths 1m wide with 35cm of brambles on either side. When I say "rutted" I mean 0.5m deep (and steep) holes that are full of mud/water. Absolutely impossible to ride down on a gravel bike as the holes are the full width of the path, and I'd be amazed if anyone managed it even on a mountain bike.
With "prefer byways" I get minor roads, which in my area means paved (asphalt) minor roads and country lanes, plus firm(ish) cycle routes. The routing engine doesn't refuse to use a non-paved roads, but it avoids it where possible.
Basically, "prefer byways" is a good option generally for me. "Balanced" would probably be OK in summer except where the paths are overgrown (although a machete would be required as mentioned by someone else!).