this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
72 points (97.4% liked)

World News

39331 readers
2510 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The United States will soon provide antipersonnel mines to Ukraine, a U.S. official confirmed late Tuesday, in a move that followed Ukraine’s first deployment of long-range U.S.-supplied ballistic missiles in an attack on Russia.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Oh goody! Let us sit and watch as they seed the soil with death in waiting for uninvolved civilians for the next 50 years.

[–] CoCo_Goldstein 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

From the article...

"The official also pointed to the function of the mines, which they said require a battery for operation and will not detonate once the battery runs out after a period of a few hours to a few weeks."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That's brilliant engineering but also...I wonder how common some kind of reverse-dud would be?

"Oh cool it's probably inert because that was MONTHS ag--"

[–] chaospatterns 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Batteries are bounded by more predictable chemistry more so than something like the breakdown of a mechanical based trigger waiting for rust or decomposition. Chemistry makes it easier to model and predict. If you've got a 1Ah battery and it consumes x watt hours per hour, then it takes y days to burn through. Tolerances that cause the battery to have slightly more or less capacity or component power consumption will likely be <5%, thus not radically different because nobody is timing this to the minute.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

You're absolutely right. Very good points! I thought that too, a major improvement over analogue mechanisms that have more unpredictable longevity!

I suppose if the batteries are actively discharging as a failsafe, that makes sense.

I was thinking about how sometimes you'd pick up like, a TV remote that's been sitting since 1993 and astonishingly the little red light blinks when you push a button, if only faintly, and for a second.