this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
1060 points (97.8% liked)

People Twitter

5339 readers
2843 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
1060
Why is no one talking about how unproductive it is to have verify every "hallucination" ChatGPT gives you? (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 weeks ago by phoneymouse to c/[email protected]
115 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spankmonkey 6 points 3 weeks ago

Those people were wrong because wikipedia requires actual citations from credible sources, not comedic subreddits and infowars. Wikipedia is also completely open about the information being summarized, both in who is presenting it and where someone can confirm it is accurate.

AI is a presented to the user as a black box and tries to be portray it as equivalent to human with terms like 'hallucinations' which really mean 'is wrong a bunch, lol'.