this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
13 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

1110 readers
143 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Image heading: The Garmin Instinct 3 smartwatch would follow the Instinct 2 (above). (Image source: Garmin)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] evasive_chimpanzee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't have one, but I know some people who do have them. It seems like the solar charging can't keep up with the draw of regular smartwatch use plus the regular full cadence of sensor data acquisition. I think it mainly just effectively gives you a slightly longer battery life. Theoretically, in power saver mode or whatever with decreased sensor data acquisition, you might be able to get much longer.

Pulse oximetry in particular seems to be an energy hog. I don't think any of the garmin solar smartwatches are really designed to not need to be charged.

In a pinch, you could probably keep one going for a very long time (and possibly indefinitely) in the power saving mode.

[โ€“] Alphane_Moon 1 points 3 months ago

I see, I think I will stick to regular watches for now. ๐Ÿ˜†

Cheers!