World News

32676 readers

1554 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

127

Nuclear Power Was Once Shunned at Climate Talks. Now, It’s a Rising Star. (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 2 months ago by Sine_Fine_Belli to c/[email protected]

50 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Diplomjodler3 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Those 800 wind turbines can be built in a month. Building a nuclear plant takes decades. And nuclear fuel reprocessing had never been economical by a long shot. Your pipe dreams will always regain just that and that's before we even start talking about proliferation and nuclear waste.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Building a nuclear plant takes decades.

In China they do it in 6 years...

https://www.statista.com/statistics/712841/median-construction-time-for-reactors-since-1981/

[–] ByteJunk 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And in those 6 years, you could have built over 6x that capacity in renewables, easy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You can also built more than 1 reactor at the same time

[–] 418_im_a_teapot 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The same can be said of any power source?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Sure, but the other commenter conveniently forgot that that's the case for nuclear as well

[–] ByteJunk 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You could, but with that colossal amount of resources you could have built 12x in renewables, probably more because of economy of scale.

And if you decide to commit all those resources to renewables, you probably just created a booming local industry of well paying jobs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But then you still haven't solved any of the issues with renewables (at least solar and wind); The amount of space they take up, their inconsistent power output and power grids which haven't been designed for them.

[–] ByteJunk 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It saddens me that we're here dealing with a push for obsolete, untenable solutions, and all the while, China keeps solving your "impossible issues" on the daily:

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20241113-will-chinas-ultra-high-voltage-grid-pay-off-for-renewable-power

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

That's what happens when not everything is privatised and only made for direct profit, I suppose