this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
111 points (97.4% liked)
United States | News & Politics
1922 readers
882 users here now
Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is it bad now to be against genocide depending on who is doing it?
No I think it's because it's too late. Had this support come before the election, who knows how it could've affected the result.
She was calling it a genocide and for Congress to block arms sales 7 months ago.
Ah ok. I haven't really been following her as much with everything that's been going on. It just felt that Sanders was along alone in this fight since he's the only one I've heard of that was so vocal about it.
Sanders and Warren were both against it before the election.
It would have divided the Dems even more. The right time to have this discussion was during the non existent Primary that should have happened back starting in January.