this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
-1 points (42.9% liked)

Physics

1332 readers
11 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello,

Today, I was further exploring my ideas on how my transformations work, and I came to an interesting realization.

When people talk about magic, it’s often seen as the art of manipulating energy to alter reality. This got me thinking about the Big Bang and E=MC².

It is hypothesized that the Big Bang was an event that released hot, condensed pure energy, which then exploded into the fundamental building blocks that formed matter. Now, my question is: when people say magic uses energy, what if that energy is simply pure energy? And what if the reason people can’t use magic is due to two factors: self belief and the realistic ability to activate and shape energy into the desired form?

I’d love some feedback. I believe this idea, if it works for others, could have huge implications. Like regrowing body parts, changing physical forms, powering entire cities, and much more.

Much like science, it requires a tool to be used. Such as particle accelerators. In the case of magic, these tools are often your body or a wand.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DaddysLittleSlut 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] DaddysLittleSlut 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

That is a possibility but rather I think the universe itself is in control but there is deities such as those who either completely learn to or are born able to harness power and those born on another dimension like 2d,3d,4d,5d. Though for us they are like those of which we see as God, Loki, Odin, Venus, Dionysus. While Jesus would have been the powers of someone like god but in a human body. Just like demigods or as Dionysus was originally.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

I think the universe itself is in control

I expressed the same idea earlier as: it's a differential equation. There's no you and I. There's the equation.

I don't care what names previously have been associated with that idea.

There's counter examples to that idea though, that I mentioned earlier.