this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
388 points (97.8% liked)

Offbeat

1263 readers
57 users here now

The world is a weird place filled with even weirder news.

Post your funny, weird, strange, or quirky news stories here!

Lemmy.ca Rules

Community Rules

Similar Communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive/mirror: https://archive.ph/ANMD5

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themeatbridge 5 points 2 days ago

News is a product, and hype is marketing. Getting you to consume their content is a sale, and they are comfortable lying to you to get you to read it. But notice that in both cases, the message is that government is ineffective. Either it is an overreaction or an utter failure at protecting consumers. Both are lies.

There shouldn't be a recall at all, just an announcement that the butter wasn't labeled properly for people allergic to milk products.

That's a recall. Even if it's just an announcement with no further action, it's called a recall. In this case, it is a Class 2 recall, which means low risk and minimal effort. Retailers and distributors cannot continue to sell an improperly labelled product, so they are returning it to the manufacturer so it can be relabelled and sold, or discarded. Consumers are told they can discard it if they have a milk allergy, or they can use it because there's nothing else wrong with it. If there is waste, it is the manufacturer's fault. The system is working as intended with good effect.

There should be a recall, because the butter wasn't properly labelled and they need to let people know, even if there is minimal risk.