this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
344 points (98.3% liked)

World News

39119 readers
2770 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don't go inside Lebanon and assassinate thousands of militants, that's just an impossible expectation

Maybe in your magical fairy world you can, but in the real world 2 dead kids from 3.000 strikes would be considered very precise

[–] FlyingSquid -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's quite dishonest to act like that it was only 2 dead kids and ignore the thousands of wounded and the other 10 dead people. Especially when a link you yourself showed people says so.

Misinformation is not allowed in c/worldnews.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not acting like those were the only civilian casualties. It's just what's brought up all the time. 'Thousands' of civilians wounded seems very unlikely when there's only <3.000 of these devices going off and the extent of the explosions visible from the leaked footage. Reeks of misinformation if you ask me

[–] FlyingSquid -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is from the link you provided.

More than 3,500 people were injured.

So now you're saying we can't trust the link you gave us?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But it's you that's suggesting those injured are all civilians

If not, how many of them are?

[–] FlyingSquid -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now your claim is that most or all of the 3500 injured were terrorists? Really?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well if they had around 3.000 pagers exploding...

I'm kidding, of course!

All 3.000 Hezbros (bar the 30 that died) must have already passed their secure one-way pagers handed to them by the Hezbollah leadership on to unsuspecting civilians. After all, who wouldn't want to be carrying around a mysterious one-way pager that periodically shows you cryptic messages?? "Hello Nighthawk. Ze goats are riding ze bicycles. I repeat: ze goats are..." KABOOOM

[–] FlyingSquid 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Got it. Shrapnel is not a thing that happens when there are explosions. Weird, I always thought it was a thing and that when you're in a crowd and the bomb planted on you explodes, that shrapnel goes into all the people around you. But they were probably terrorists too, am I right? After all, they exist in Lebanon and I'm told that existing in Palestine makes one a terrorist and it's right nearby.

But the important thing here is that you found a way to make light of dead children and turn it all into a joke. That really makes you look good.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you now suggesting that the average Hezbro came off unharmed, and only the people in the vicinity were hurt?

Did you see any of the leaked videos? Did you see the remains of exploded devices?

I've got a mild feeling you're just discarding all the information that's available to you, instead clinging to some weird unsubstantiated hope that this mostly hit civilians

[–] FlyingSquid 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No. I am not suggesting that. And the only way you could possibly believe that is what I was suggesting is if you didn't actually read my post.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Can you explain how you came to the conclusion that most of the 3500 injured people must have been civilians?

[–] FlyingSquid 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I did not come to such a conclusion, nor did I make such a claim.

You are the one who made the claims here:

Now, you have lied twice that I said that most or all of the injured were civilians. I would not advise you to do it a third time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would advise you to read your own posts again

Yes, I am claiming most of the injured must have been Hezbro's. You clearly seem to have taken the opposite position in this post:

Now your claim is that most or all of the 3500 injured were terrorists? Really?

When talking about the civilian casualties you claimed I was ignoring:

the thousands of wounded and the other 10 dead people

So you have the 2 children (clearly civilians) and the other 10 people wiki states were civilians sandwiching these 'thousands of wounded' that I'm 'ignoring in my calculation'. Why would you add those 'thousands of wounded that I'm ignoring' in there if not to claim that they were civilians and not Hezbros??

Why would you post that first quote if you yourself agree that most of those injured were actually Hezbros and not civilians (something you're advising me not to challenge)?

This could all be cleared up really easily if you just say how many of the injured you think are civilians and what you're basing that on

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This could all be cleared up really easily if you just say how many of the injured you think are civilians and what you’re basing that on

Unlike you, I do not act like I know things I obviously can't know.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Me and a few others here are responding to people claiming that this attack "murdered an insane number of civilians", "killed a majority of civilians", "was like an anthrax attack" and so on.

I'm showing publicly available information and how that leads to me to conclude that the above statements go against all logic.

Now, if your final argument is that one can't really comment on any news from the Middle East because 'we can't know' then yeah, I guess I don't have any more rebuttal for that

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 1 week ago

I'm really tired of you putting words in my mouth. I think you need to have a discussion with the Flying Squid in your head because you have not been talking to me and I'm sick and tired of correcting you.