this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
1735 points (98.5% liked)

World News

39183 readers
2236 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

*edited to correct conversion in title

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Politicians and publications that acknowledge the climate crisis should probably start using that term instead of climate change then.

[–] GladiusB 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if that is used intentionally? Like they would have a reason to make a narrative of denial?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It’s because the “fact” the the fossil fuel industry coined the term climate change is false.

This is the preferred term by scientists, and it has been since before “global warming” became a term.

[–] GladiusB 1 points 1 year ago

I was being cynical. I'm fully aware of their hellbent ideologies.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Calling it climate change implies it is of natural change. It belittles the criticality of the human induced influence. The fossil fuel industry knows exactly why they are calling it climate change and not climate crisis. Global warming is also, as much as climate change, scientifically correct, but let's be honest. Since when does the industry care about scientifical facts? They use that in ill faith.

[–] Techmaster 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's called climate change because it's more than global warming. A lot of things are changing, and they're all bad. To just say global warming would be ignoring all of the other problems.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I agree. Global warming is one aspect of many of our current climate crisis. And it will become worse when politics won't restrict the reign of fossil fuel industries.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

We used to call it The Greenhouse Effect but that was way too scary so BP gave us this bs instead

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The fossil fuel industry denied climate change was happening at all for a long time after the term was being used by scientists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it does not imply Natural causes. There is zero (implied or explicit) information as to why the change is happening. It is merely stating a fact.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I seem to have issues trying to convey my intention when I am highlighting why these industries use the term climate change now. I try it once more.

'Climate is changing. It is something that has always happened. It's natural. Climate change is completely normal.' That is the implied meaning, especially by fossil fuel industries, which more than often try to shift the blame away from them by either making it a personal issue (carbon footprint) or describing it as a natural occurance. Intentionally ignoring their influence by burning resources and releasing damaging gases, raising temperatures, melting ice, damaging the saline conveyor belt.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, that is indeed the case.