this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
44 points (94.0% liked)

Pleasant Politics

285 readers
56 users here now

Politics without the jerks.

This community is watched over by a ruthless robot moderator to keep out bad actors. I don't know if it will work. Read [email protected] for a full explanation. The short version is don't be a net negative to the community and you can post here.

Rules

Post political news, your own opinions, or discussion. Anything goes.

All posts must follow the slrpnk sitewide rules.

No personal attacks, no bigotry, no spam. Those will get a manual temporary ban.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago (12 children)

But gender did play a role. Time and again, voters, very often women themselves, told me that they just didn’t think that “America is ready for a female president”. People said they couldn’t “see her in the chair” and asked if I “really thought a woman could run the country”. One person memorably told me that she couldn’t vote for Harris because “you don’t see women building skyscrapers”. Sometimes, these people would be persuaded, but more often than not it was a red line. Many conversations would start with positive discussions on policy and then end on Harris and her gender. That is an extraordinary and uncomfortable truth.

There's many valid criticism of Harris but this one is by far the stupidest. I wonder how many people had this influence their vote. I don't think she lost the election over it, but it would be interesting to see a number on America's level of misogyny.

[–] HonoraryMancunian 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The atrocities being committed by Israel in Gaza only came up six times in more than 1,000 calls.

I guess what people have been saying about this perhaps weren't particularly true. Which leads me on to believe the misogyny line even more.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't put that much faith in that number honestly. It's anecdotal and a small sample size. It's very clear that Arabs arre concentrated in critical swing states like Michigan and Wisconsin and based on the number of voters for both sides as well as for the Greens, they likely could have made the difference. I don't think it was the only reason Harris lost, but I do think it was a big one.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

It's not just anecdotal, but this guy obviously had a list selected on some sort of political axis. You don't get "communist" complaints if your list is about getting out the vote in core Democratic bases.

load more comments (10 replies)