this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024

585 points (94.8% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3508 readers

989 users here now

Rules:

Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
No spam or soliciting for money.
No racism or other bigotry allowed.
Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

[email protected]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

585

Considering last night's results, I don't expect NATO to be credible 4 years from now (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by [email protected] to c/noncredibledefense

304 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] [email protected] -7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

As an european: Good riddance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio

When the US speaks about protection, they mean vassality. It means protection like the mafia does.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Let me get this straight, you're siding with the enemy occupation? If not, then why would you have a problem with a sovereign nation retaking their own country.

"A stay-behind operation is one where a country places secret operatives or organizations in its own territory, for use in case of a later enemy occupation. The stay-behind operatives would then form the basis of a resistance movement, and act as spies from behind enemy lines."

They leave spies in their own territory when being invaded in order to get their country back. How dare they‽

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Ah yes the bologna bombing was done to protect the italian territory.

Least brainrotted westoid lmao