this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
-51 points (26.2% liked)

People Twitter

5519 readers
3446 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People didn't choose the lesser evil, they only chose their kind of evil. Which is unquestionably the greater one.

[–] IndustryStandard -5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Your argument of lesser evil is irrelevant. The voters have proven this.

Fearmongering is how Fascists win over voters. Kamala was the lesser Fascist.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand why it is irrelevant and how voters choosing greater evil proved this.

What are you even trying to say - that there's no such thing as lesser evil because voters chose greater evil? Or that Kamala is no lesser evil, because voters chose greater evil?

[–] IndustryStandard 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Democrats do not get to run on fearmongering. They get to run on hope.

When the response to genocide is "Trump would be worse!" there is no hope offered. Everything in this campaign was fearmongering. And Democrats do not get to run on fearmongering to make people support their genocidal fascism.

Instead they should have provided actual policies to give hope. No genocide. Healthcare. Union rights. Not Liz Cheney.

Not "fascism but a little less than Trump."