this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
1 points (60.0% liked)
Economy
431 readers
174 users here now
Lemmy Community for economy, business, politics, stocks, bonds, product releases, IPOs, advice, news, investment, videos, predictions, government, money, politics, debate, current trends and more.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm not talking about touchscreen only android devices (although there are a number of controllers that can turn an android phone or tablet into a handheld gaming device). I'm talking about Android based, handled gaming devices like the Ayn Odin series or the Ayaneo Pocket S or up coming Pocket Evo. All of these have faster hardware than the switch, with physical controls and active cooling.
What, and sell less Switches? Don't think Nintendo would ever do that considering their software is the only reason people buy their hardware.
If Nintendo makes a profit on their hardware then, yes, I could see why they wouldn't want to do what I'm suggesting. However, if they are only breaking even on the hardware, or losing money, then selling less hardware would be a good thing.
They are the only one that makes a profit per unit sold, compared to Sony and Microsoft. They confirmed this again before the Switch launched, and if we conveniently forget about 2020 for a second, manufacturing would have only gotten cheaper over time.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180906052741/https://www.technobuffalo.com/2017/01/31/nintendo-switch-sold-at-profit/
I see. Well, since that's the case, I can see why they haven't made their games available on other platforms.
Personally, I haven't purchased a Nintendo game in more than a decade. I would consider buying Nintendo games if I could play them on other hardware, but I'm not going to purchase a switch just to play Nintendo first party titles. But I suppose Nintendo does well enough without consumers like me.