this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
19 points (61.4% liked)

Linuxsucks

206 readers
42 users here now

Rules:

  1. FOSS advocates and Linux evangelists aren't welcome. -We ask that you block us.
  2. Moderation is heavy handed. Try to stay on topic.
  3. No Complaining Mute the sub if users, content, or rules bother you

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theunknownmuncher -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No no no, its "not Linux"! Which is bad! Or it "is Linux" if that's actually bad instead! Duh?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about.
Android uses the Linux kernel. So it is a Linux system.
But only in the same way as your Chromebook, your TV, your car's entertainment system and your programmable vibrator are Linux systems.
Doesn't mean "good" or "bad", doesn't mean "hackable" or "free software".

Although on Android, it's trivially easy to install a proper Linux with all rights, and access to the phone's sensors, sms, phone calls, GPS, etc. in a chroot environment.

[–] theunknownmuncher 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was sarcastically mocking the guy who makes all the posts in this community

[–] madthumbs 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I saw it as affirming my point. Linux users use naming conventions that suit them.

Debian is 'stable' -because it never gets updated. -But to evangelist: because it supposedly doesn't crash (same could be said for WinME though if you were careful what you ran on it).

Linux evangelist calls Android Linux if it suits their line of defensive argument at the time. Denies if if they're arguing whether Linux has spyware or ads. (and for that matter, lets look at Mozilla, Fedora, KDE, etc.)

[–] theunknownmuncher 0 points 1 month ago

I saw it as affirming my point.

Oh I'm sure that you did

[–] Cort 1 points 1 month ago

Ugh, my car runs an os from Microsoft.