this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
48 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

1121 readers
338 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BombOmOm 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Intel has somehow managed to make slower chips, that use more power, that also murder themselves due to manufacturing errors.

Intel is in a really bad place and they are going to have a hard time clawing this market share back. They completely dominated this space 10 years ago, and they have been slowly losing it for awhile now.

[–] hohoho 7 points 3 months ago

To be perfectly fair, the issue you brought up only applies to the high end Intel 13th and 14th gen desktop processors. The article however is about datacenter processors. Anecdotally, ever since EPYC was released I’ve only been buying AMD processors for my datacenter. It was an awkward couple of years with the Intel sales reps who would downplay the arrival of 10nm when there was delay after delay.