this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
57 points (98.3% liked)

Explain Like I'm Five

14398 readers
1 users here now

Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Following the budget announcement in the UK, why is the media obsessed with the predicted growth being 0.2% lower, instead of applauding the much needed investment in our public services? Does it really matter that much?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The tax income of the government is a percentage of the GDP, and taxes are in the end where money for investments into infrastructure and other stuff comes from.

If investments must be done regardless, it means the government has to borrow money and pay it back plus interest in the future, which again is paid for with tax money.

So if the GDP sinks, future tax income must increase to balance it - either through an increase in GDP down the road, or through higher taxes.

A reduction in GDP also means that either local consumers aren't buying as much, or exports are shrinking, both of which are negative indicators for the local labour market and lead to layoffs.

[–] Takumidesh 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's important to note that most of the money borrowed by the US govt is in the form of bonds to its own citizens, and the interest paid is to those citizens.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The OP is talking about the UK though.

[–] Takumidesh 3 points 1 month ago

Good point and I missed that in the original post.

It does appear to be a similar situation with the UK though, only with pensions and other funds.

load more comments (1 replies)