this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
52 points (81.7% liked)

Atheism

4164 readers
127 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Posting this because I think it's an interesting examination of the overlap (or lack thereof) between atheists and general skeptics. It's worth remembering that the term 'atheism' only means a rejection of theistic beliefs; non-theistic beliefs that are nonetheless irrational and unsupported by evidence are not relevant to the term. And yet one can easily see why there is an overlap between these two communities and why many atheists scoff at other atheists who profess belief in things like astrology, ghosts, reincarnation, etc.

I'm definitely one of those who doesn't believe in anything supernatural, but I've certainly met atheists who do. It's worth remembering the two groups aren't synonymous.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] andy_wijaya_med 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Could you elaborate, why do you believe that free will doesn't exist? You could also give me some reading materials. I'm a skeptic, I'm an atheist, I do think that free will exists.

[–] FringeTheory999 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I can round some stuff up. I don’t need a reason to believe that free will doesn’t exist, I need a reason to believe that free will DOES exist. Belief follows evidence. Not the other way around. Here is a good video by a fellow free will denier and physicist Sabine Hossenfelder: https://youtu.be/TI5FMj5D9zU She goes pretty in depth on your lack of free will.

[–] Buffalox 6 points 2 years ago

Belief follows evidence.

Rational belief follows logic based on evidence. There are things you can infer.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

Could you elaborate, why do you believe that free will doesn’t exist?

I'm another person, may I offer 'my' reasoning?

(Free) will is a decision making process, generating a decision as it's output. Basically, it's an algorithm (arbitrarily complex).

How can this algorithm generate it's output? It can ...

  1. Use available data to determine a decision (deterministic)
  2. Use a source of randomness to make a decision (random)
  3. Combine #1 and #2 (randomized deterministic)

I cannot conceive or imagine any other option. Granted, this is an argument from ignorance. But I think however 'free will' works, it can be boiled down to one of these three approaches, or nested sub-algorithms which again build from these three ingredients.

And none of that resembles what we mean when we say 'free will'. Is it free if it is determined? Is it will if it is random?

How is 'free will', fundamentally, different from algorithms available to computer games?

For example, if I choose burger over pizza for lunch, my brain taps into available data (my taste preferences, what I ate recently, how I expect to feel after eating either choice, ...) and does it in a fuzzy way which involves some randomness. I arrive at a choice which I want, because I prefer it (in a random margin). I could have chosen otherwise, if the data had been different to change my decision, or if the random influence tipped the scales the other way.

Maybe it just feels like being in control because we cannot tell the result of the calculation until the calculation has finished. Weighing the options and settling for a decision is that process.

I love discussing this, so please challenge my view, you're welcome!