this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
212 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

59120 readers
3733 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChicoSuave 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It will end up like every other Russian knock-off: made by the Chinese when Russia eventually gives up

[–] just_another_person 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, it goes WAY back to pre-WW2. Russia basically made copying everyone else's technology a major economic driver for them for decades, and it was all based around trying to sucker poorer countries into buying their awful products.

Cameras, radios, cars, weapons. Hell they even stole NASA Space Shuttle designs and tech to build their own, which just ended up in a junkyard.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And the Buran system was more impressive than the shuttle, capable of completely automated flight!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oh? Which test flight demonstrated that?

[–] just_another_person 3 points 1 week ago

I don't think it was ever confirmed. They only flew the thing once, which was confirmed. Anything else claiming superior tech I'd call USSR propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I'm not sure whether the orbital flight counts as test or operational, but that one. The prior test flights only had automated landings.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So they say but since it never even went into space it's a bold claim.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm reading that it orbited at an altitude of up to 263 km, well above the Karman line. Is that not space?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well that's debatable but really the point is it never did a re-entry so we really don't know how reusable it would have been.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If it didn't do a reentry, how did it get down from that altitude?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

By landing?

Reentry doesn't mean flying downwards it means actually coming in at a high enough speed to generate heating. Otherwise it's just falling.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

I'm pretty sure any reentry from orbit is going to involve high enough speeds to generate heating.

[–] SupraMario 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It's just like their foxbat claims...turned out it was a flying brick.

Edit: apparently I pissed off some tankies lol

It's well known that the foxbat was heavily exaggerated in its capabilities. It's how we ended up with the f15 and it's insane capabilities. Just like now russia fighting in Ukraine, paper tiger.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Of course everything's made by China anyway including all the high-end stuff. The exception being computer chips.