this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
558 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59676 readers
4499 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Great. Now how about Citadel's $65 Billion in securities sold but not purchased? Just kickin that can, eh?

Hard to see how the SEC and DTCC aren't complicit.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Citadel commands something like 8-10% of daily market volume. They're the textbook Too Big To Fail investor. SEC won't touch them for that reason alone, although there are plenty of other ideological/conflict of interest reasons, too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I don't disagree, but it's the whole REASON the SEC was created in 1934.

If anyone needed further proof of end-stage capitalism, it's this goddamn insistence on regressive everything.

Anything deemed "Too Big To Fail" is also a national security risk. Nationalize the whole firm, send the executives off with whatever loot they already have, and ironclad legalese to prevent them from ever setting foot in a financial market again.