this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
327 points (95.8% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
5756 readers
860 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/[email protected] - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/[email protected] - General memes
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is absolutely a safety rule violation that shouldn't even fit in someone's head. But, playing Satan's proponent, what if they were certain the tanks were all empty? Would it still be dangerous?
Empty but having once been filled is more dangerous than full.
New and empty is a different story.
Why is empty but history of being filled more dangerous than full?
I could be remembering wrong, but basically any remnants inside are unpressurized, so they're all vapor, easy to heat since there's less thermal mass, and ready to light if there's any oxygen.
Because the assumption that there's no danger, coupled with the fact there's now oxygen inside the tank, much more likely to be near the flammable or explosive ranges.
When full or in use you expect it to have fuel in it and usually take more care (obviously the welder isn't), and if a leak catches fire it then turns into a torch, until the tank overheats and bleve's (very unlikely that you don't notice the torch before the bleve)
The big risk of full is, you might have a steady leak that stays in the area, and then you ignite it somehow. But the likelihood is very low that it would get to the flammable or explosive ratio in open air like this.