this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
1366 points (97.6% liked)

memes

10482 readers
5296 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you don't have this kit you will be bombarded to Temu's ads

Better version: https://lemmy.world/post/21245770

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't see its usefulness, uBlock Origin's "Cookie Notices" list does the same thing.

For consent forms consent-o-matic is better, IDCAC / ISDCAC was not created for this.

[–] pyre 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

doesn't consent o matic just accept cookies when it doesn't know how to reject them?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Consent-o-matic is about consent forms, so it'll fill the consent forms giving, by default, the least consent possible. If it doesn't know how to handle a form it'll just not auto-fill it so you'll have to do it yourself. It's not just about cookies, they are just one common way to acquire the data. IDCAC will just hide the form, because it was made to hide cookie notices and later extended to do the same for consent forms. According to the law not filling the form, not giving explicit consent, is like refusing it.

Anyway, none of these extension touch cookies directly, they are only about notice and consent forms. It's up to the website to act accordingly. And none of this will do anything about necessary cookies, or more precisely, about any data deemed necessary, however it's collected.