this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
1021 points (98.7% liked)

People Twitter

5367 readers
1702 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Anticorp 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Those are reasonable statements, but it doesn't explain why the digital equivalents cost MORE than their physical counterparts. Especially considering there's no manufacturing, distribution, shipping, storage, etc.. Sure, servers and bandwidth cost money, but nowhere near what an entire physical distribution chain costs. It's pennies on the dollar.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Especially since the marginal cost of information goods is zero

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

That assumes the work of creating or collating the information has been fully amortized. The cost of information should tend toward zero, but it should start high enough to fairly reward its creators and those who made it visible

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I can't think of a recent time where I've seen an eBook that cost more than the paperback but I haven't been looking specifically. In my experience, the eBook is usually a buck or two cheaper than the print version.

I'm open to being wrong about this.

[–] trolololol 1 points 1 month ago

All the books I've seen in Amazon are like this

I don't buy at Amazon, usually when I do is Google or Kobo, and the prices are similar to Amazons sometimes slightly cheaper.