this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
617 points (97.1% liked)

US Authoritarianism

812 readers
332 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Madison420 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

They are largely inaccurate. I offered no specificity so arguing I'm wrong there would be stupid.

I'm sorry you assumed my position without any context or reason then deigned to compare me to fascists.

That's certainly one reason.

Nope, you apparently do with your whitewashing of slavery in Briton though hilarious you mention the age of sail where the English made their money..... Trading slaves you presumptuous douche.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah, that was the point, that the Britons having their own problems is irrelevant to the specific criticism of Vikings and how they traumatized all of their neighbors for a thousand years, just as the English being evil colonizers doesn't stop the Portuguese and Spanish from also being evil colonizers.

And I didn't compare you to fascists. I said they're not the only ones guilty of revisionist history.

[–] Madison420 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's part of the inaccuracies yes, that is exactly the point.

You act like the britons weren't slave trading in Dublin and raiding their neighbors and oh yeah the thousand years of slave trading that followed.

The Viking aren't uniquely violent in their area nor are they unique in their violence when compared to global civilizations at the time. You imply the britons weren't raiding, pillaging, raping and slave trading each other which they absolutely were.

Similarly let's remember there's a huge debate about if all Norse were Viking or Vikings happened to be largely Norse given that recovered raids turn up English and Arab dudes dressed like Vikings.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The general consensus from what I'm aware of is that Viking is as good a term as any for a relatively well understood historical culture group because Germanics is too broad, Norse too specific, and Scandinavian either includes or excludes Sami and Finns unfairly depending on how you look at it.

[–] Madison420 3 points 3 weeks ago

Bingo. Loosely defined and notably not all Norse cultures.