this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
218 points (86.3% liked)

Technology

58839 readers
6048 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9point6 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Agree on the application side, but when it comes to the test suite, I'm definitely gonna consider letting an AI get that file started and then I'll run through, make sure the assertions are all what I would expect and refactor anything that needs it.

I've written countless tests in my career and I'm still gonna write countless more, but I'm glad I can at least spend less time on laborious repetition now and more time on the part of the job I actually enjoy which is actually solving problems.

[–] MeatsOfRage -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Things like unit tests I just have AI do it all now. Since running the test tells you your coverage you can verify if it got everything or not.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Here's something that might blow your mind. Coverage is not the point of tests.

If you your passing test gets 100% coverage, you can still have a bug. You might have a bunch of conditions you're not handling and a shit test that doesn't notice.

Write tests first to completely define what you want the code to do, and then write the code to pass the tests.