Rust

6137 readers

29 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

[email protected]

Credits

The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Does crates.io have a backup plan? (lemmy.bestiver.se)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It's possible that the .io cctld is going to go away [0]. Does crates.io have a backup plan at all? Does anyone know what problems it would end up causing?

I imagine the package registry having to move domains is going to cause a ton of problems.

Frankly, it's concerning to me that so much of the Rust ecosystem has chosen to standardize on shaky ccTLDs. The Indian Ocean Territory (.io) is a small island territory whose only inhabitants are a single military base, it is crazy to use that domain for something important. Serbia (.rs) is more stable, but they could still cut off access for non-Serbians if they wanted to.

[0] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.io#Phasing_Out

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Forgot to mention .sh, which is also a ccTLD for a tiny island nation, and also shouldn't be used for hosting anything that is difficult to move.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.sh

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Saint Helena is in no way comparable because it's not disputed territory. Back when Mauritius became independent the British carved out some islands for their continued colonial use, breaking (back then brand new) international law.

Saint Helena has no such connection to another country and it was uninhabited before the Dutch settled. The Brits later conquered it but even if the Dutch want it back it'd keep its autonomous territory status and therefore its own TLD, the Dutch have plenty of those.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They can still revoke its use anytime they want. Which is the main issue right?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

So can any TLD holder. The rules for .org might change to disallow individuals. .com might outlaw non-profits. .net might get restricted to ISPs. There is a small, but existent, chance that all the oxygen molecules in the room I'm in are going to decide that they'll huddle up in some corner, leaving me to suffocate. I refuse to worry about it.

If you want to be paranoid like that you can send the rust foundation some money and tell them to spend it on the .rust and .ferris gTLDs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

@barsoap @GetOffMyLan It's not even all that hypothetical tbh. I don't recall the details exactly but there was a big scare a few years ago when .org changed hands.