this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
60 points (96.9% liked)

RetroGaming

19497 readers
299 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ch00f 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Emulators can’t always play every game. I know Pokémon Snap has always struggled to run.

This is identical to real hardware and upscales everything to 4K. Not to mention native support for Bluetooth controllers and other creature comforts.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Getting an N64 + a RetroTink to upscale costs the same or more than this Analogue product (depends a lot on the N64 and RetroTink you buy). This is actually a fairly good value. I’m shocked Analogue priced it where it is considering that the Pocket is FOMO-sold and pricey.

[–] ch00f 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, I was fully expecting this thing to be like $400.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The real question is if you’ll be able to purchase one of the 17 they’ve produced or if you’ll have to wait for their limited edition translucent version in a year.

[–] CoffeeJunkie 1 points 3 weeks ago

Omg I would love translucent

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

That's a really good point. Software emulation is fine for most people, but Analogue stuff is going to be as close to the original as possible plus having all those modern things that we expect now. I haven't emulated N64 stuff very much so maybe there's more complications than I was thinking.