this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
55 points (82.4% liked)

Futurology

1851 readers
82 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The "problem" is that hydrogen is an extremely complicated way for some people to save like 40 minutes per year over charging an EV in a handful of very specific circumstances, which really highlights just how fucked we actually are in terms of direct climate action.

Like, as it stands an EV already means you get to wake up every morning with a fueled vehicle instead of needing to divert to a disgusting gas station every other week. The only circumstance where charging time is an issue is on long trips, where it adds roughly 20 minutes for 4 hours traveled. and we are supposed to believe that the solution to this is handling a pressurized gas which readily defuses through solid steel containment vessels? Because that is somehow the solution to the one trip per year you take which requires highway charging? The information space here is literally "owning an EV means you can only watch 137 reruns of House in 2025 instead of 138," but you actually think people are going to be fine with an 800psi hydrogen tank which leaks at a rate of $1 per day?

[–] Luvs2Spuj 1 points 2 months ago

If you only want to talk about EVs, current technology and specific circumstances, sure.