this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
1045 points (99.1% liked)

memes

10649 readers
4113 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(Yes, of course I know that's not the Enterprise-D and that TNG came out in 1986, but you try making a better debunking joke.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NutWrench 30 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Also keep in mind that the astronauts communicated with Earth by radio. Anyone with even 1920s radio technology would have figured out that the astronauts weren't broadcasting from the Moon.

We were in the middle of a cold war with the soviets back in the 1960s. Proving the moon landing was fake would have been the propaganda coup of the century for them. What possible reason would they have to stay quiet about that?

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If we could fake the moon landings, we also could have faked the Soviet Union.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

We've always been at war with Eurasia

[–] FlyingSquid 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We were in the middle of a cold war with the soviets back in the 1960s. Proving the moon landing was fake would have been the propaganda coup of the century for them. What possible reason would they have to stay quiet about that?

That's always been my number one reason why the moon landing was definitely not faked. The Soviets never caught wind of it between 1969 and 1992? Come on.

[–] A_Random_Idiot 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Plus we left retroreflectors on the moon, that we can shoot laser beams at and get a return bean back.

its used to measure the drift of the moon away from earth.

the lunar reoglith is not reflective enough to bounce a signal back (and its been tested to death)

[–] Omgpwnies 3 points 2 months ago

We know it reflects light, so that just tells me we haven't used a big enough laser yet :p

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Not sure I understand. Are you agreeing that the moon landing happened but you also claim the footage is faked? Do you have any reasons to support that? You mention something about radio technology from the 1920s, but the moon landing occurred nearly 50 years later, so I hardly see how that is relevant.

Edit: I misread your comment. Thanks to @[email protected] for pointing it out.

[–] turmacar 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, they're saying regardless of if the signal was encrypted or whatever format it was in, anyone with a directional antenna could triangulate where the signal was coming from. If there were only a repeater on the moon that NASA was transmitting to that was then sending the signal back, that would also have been able to be determined.

Both the Russians, who had a vested interest in embarrassing the US, and every other amateur and professional radio operator on the planet agreed that the moon landing was being transmitted from the moon.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Ah. That makes sense. Thanks for the explanation!