this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
1123 points (98.3% liked)

People Twitter

5454 readers
994 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] Siethron 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

135, that's not a 90 degree angle in the problem. Just visually.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Oh that's just a cheap trick. You are right, it's 80 degrees despite looking like 90 degrees.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

You are right that is 80° so the value of x will be 135°

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Nah, the imagery tricks you. 180 degrees to a line. 180 degrees inside a triangle.

So you can gather the inside unlabeled angle on the triangle on the left is only 80 degrees: (180-[60+40])

So you then know it's 100 on the right side of that +35 leaves you with 45 degrees left for the top of the right one.

180-45=. 135 degrees

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Also if you add up all visible angles you get 135, so I'm sold on that alone. No no no, I won't hear any rebuttals.