Politics

0 readers

26 users here now

About Community

Community dedicated to U.S. Politics on the Fediverse.

Rules

Civil discussions: Hate speech, personal attacks, and flaming or baiting people into uncivil behavior is prohibited.
Code Of Conduct: Respect thebrainbin.org (Instance this community is on) and mbin's sitewide code of conduct
No Spams: Post and comment spamming is prohibited. Spammers will be banned at the earliest.

founded 3 months ago

Walz says the Electoral College ‘needs to go’ (www.politico.com)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] acosmichippo 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

isn’t there an alliance of states who agree to elect their votes to the majority winner? if those states get up to 271(?) or whatever the electoral college magic number is, congress doesn’t matter.

edit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 2 points 3 months ago

isn’t there an alliance of states who agree to elect their votes to the majority winner?

There is, but the legality of this compact is still in the hands of the SCOTUS. And the math problem is the same. You'd need a majority of EC votes, when states with that majority are controlled by Republican governors and legislators. If you look at the list, it's just a litany of states that already reliably vote Dem.

Talk to me when Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Nevada join. Even then, I guarantee this gets challenged and thrown out in a 6-3 SCOTUS decision.