this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
521 points (99.6% liked)

fedia shitpost

0 readers
34 users here now

fedia shitpost

Rules

tbd

founded 3 months ago
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

'Solve' incorrect

More like 'we need your opinion on all this evidence we have'

[–] LemmyKnowsBest 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Right?! I've always found it odd that the judicial system can't get anything accomplished without bringing in 12 random Joe Schmoes off the street.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

The judicial system can get plenty accomplished without juries. In fact, the number of disputes settled by jury trial has dropped drastically in the last fifty years, especially with the Supreme Court ruling on Brady v. the United States in 1970 that upheld plea bargaining.

The result has been a stronger judiciary that more readily upholds state authority. Instead of a prosecutor proving to a dozen other citizens that you are guilty, a prosecutor needs to persuade you alone that, whether you're guilty or not, you'll suffer more if you don't admit guilt than if you do. That's a fucked up premise, IMO.