this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
521 points (99.6% liked)

fedia shitpost

0 readers
32 users here now

fedia shitpost

Rules

tbd

founded 3 months ago
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ptsf 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

🤔 to my understanding DNA evidence is one of the very few things that is actually reliable when it comes to forensic science. What issues do you have with it?

[–] Warl0k3 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Unfortunately your understanding, and that of nearly every juror in the US, is wrong. Tainted by the pro-police television narrative, that cops never mess up and that all crimes can be solved with the application of Forensic Science™. The link I provided elaborates further, but one reason from the concerningly long list: DNA testing really is little more than circumstantial evidence - it's ridiculously easy for your DNA to show up at the scene of a crime you were not involved with. In general, it's more precise than blood splatter or ballistic analyses, but not nearly by the margin you think.