this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
88 points (92.3% liked)
PCGaming
6522 readers
184 users here now
Rule 0: Be civil
Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy
Rule #2: No advertisements
Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments
Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions
Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.
Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts
Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments
Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Where do you see the address?
https://corp.sec.state.ma.us/CorpWeb/CorpSearch/CorpSearchResults.aspx
9 ALFRED CIRCLE BEDFORD, MA 01730 USA
So I went for a little drive...
https://i.imgur.com/gXWIXj4.jpeg
See that little black placard?
https://i.imgur.com/oglXV45.jpeg
Valve has the resources, yes, but wouldn't go that far for no payoff. I'm convinced they're a real company, not an ARG.
Pahaha if op keeps this up they're gonna get this lab in trouble for cribbing half life ip
Apparently they reached out to Valve and got the OK from someone to use the name and variant logo, according to a comment I saw either here or on reddit.
Not if contributing to actual research, for which they applied for govt grants (and received) contributes to a tax write-off.
They have the means.
I'm not sure if you're serious. Technically yes, Valve could set up a real biotech company, staff it, apply for government grants, receive money, and do actual biotech work... But it doesn't make sense to do for a video game marketing stunt.
Why would it not make sense for them to do it? It is the most anticipated videogames of all time. The videogame community has basically taunted Valve saying they're afraid to make the games and valve has been firm that fear does not guide them. So obviously they will go as big as anyone's ever gone.
It in fact makes less sense that a biotech firm would call themselves black Mesa, and start up a faux ARG for the lulz.
What does spinning off a biotech company achieve for marketing HL3? Especially when Black Mesa has already been released and isn't even Valve's game?
We are talking about HL3 as a result.
That is how marketing works.
That's a big reach. It's spending a lot of money for not much gain, when they could spend that money either on regular advertising or on a real ARG campaign.
If it was an ARG for HL3, why would it be based on Black Mesa? That's the HL1 remake fan project that's already done.
What money is it spending exactly? A lease for a small building and a small town in Massachusetts? Maybe 10 grand a month? A salary for, as far as LinkedIn tells us, 2:00 to 10 individuals, we'll call it a million dollars.
Are you telling me that Valve isn't willing to invest 2 million dollars in advertising the most anticipated video game of all time?
What do you think valves marketing budget is?
Do you think there's a modulation when it comes to expenditures for half-life 3 should they arise?
When was the last time you saw an ad for a valve game outside of the steam ecosystem?
Bedford isn't a small town. There's a bunch of other biotech facilities in that area. It looks like it'd be a relatively cheap building to lease, but not as cheap as you're thinking.
I think if they were going to spend $2m on marketing, they'd actually use it for marketing, not spinning off a biotech company.
Oh right. All those ads you saw for all those games they put out. Yeah. No, good point, valve definitely has a tradition of spending their marketing dollar just like every other company out there. If half-life 3's coming out, we'll probably hear about it in the Sears catalog. 🙄 What was I thinking.