this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
1165 points (98.1% liked)

People Twitter

5034 readers
1980 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChicoSuave 158 points 4 days ago (14 children)

If there is no fact checking, Kamala needs to be ready to ask why Trump nominated someone who isn't allowed in any Ashley Furniture store in the lower 48 states and Alberta.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (12 children)

You... do know Harris (it's weird you used her first name) and Trump won't be at the Vice-Presidential debate, right?

[–] Jarix 9 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Not weird at all, it's her first name. That's what it's for

[–] Jtotheb 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Start looking at how many people say “Kamala” versus how many people say “Joe”, “Tim”, “Donald”, or “JD”.

[–] Jarix 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah no thanks. Its hard enough to get away from american politcs at a time like this as it is. Ive no interest or capacity to go out of my way to subject myself to more of it than i have to.

[–] Jtotheb 2 points 3 days ago

Okay! Next time someone implies US political discourse is getting a lil sexist, think to yourself, “Ive no interest or capacity to go out of my way to subject myself to more of it than i have to” instead of weighing in.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hoe many Joes, Tims and Donalds do you know, and how many Kamalas? In the USA, it's a name that stands out. I'm sure you intend to imply that it's patronizing in some way, but there are oerfectly legitimate reasons to call her by her first name and you're not doing yourself any favors by just assuming that none of them apply here.

[–] Jtotheb 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m glad you understand what I’m implying.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

It's not like you were subtle about it. But being understandable doesn't make it right. "Chickens build laser boxes" is also perfectly understandable.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)