this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024

986 points (93.6% liked)

Memes

45554 readers

1073 users here now

Rules:

Be civil and nice.
Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

986

“You will be more conservative as you grow older” (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

221 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So USSR was a dictatorship

No, not even the CIA thought the USSR was a dictatorship. You can't just make unsourced blanket claims based on your emotions.

the country was in ruin after WW2

Yes, they did around 4/5ths of the fighting against the Nazis in totality.

The 3 factor i mentioned are there.

If you conjure them into existence from your imagination, sure.

The data shows what everyone knows, capitalism increase inequality. But what it doesn't show is how communism made the country improve, because it didn't.

GDP per capita rose dramatically, wealth inequality dropped massively, life expectancy doubled, literacy rates trippled. The USSR had free healthcare and education, and guaranteed housing and employment. They ended famine, and made it to space from being a semi-feudal semi-industrialized nation 50 years prior. They democratized the government structure. Life absolutely improved not only under Communism, but because of it.

What i'm saying is, it couldn't help because of the war and Stalin. We don't know if it would've otherwise.

What on Earth are you trying to say? Of course the USSR had to focus on its military to survive, which impeded consumer good production, but life absolutely improved.

Cuba again is a dictatorship, and wasn't rich.

Cuba is richer than under Batista despite a cruel embargo, and isn't a dictatorship. You keep throwing out unsourced opinions as though they are facts.

The PRC is a dictatorship, China went on a horrible famine with Mao. Nowadays getting richer only because of how their economy is now fully capitalist.

The PRC practices whole-process people's democracy, the famine under Mao was the last famine in China's history of frequent famines, and China is Socialist, it has a Socialist Market Economy based on Socialism With Chinese Characteristics.

So let's say you had significant data that showed it improved some things socially. And let say you somehow managed to prove its causal and not coincidence.

I have.

I would still rather not say dictatorships like USSR or PRC are good to live under.

You would have sided with the Tsars? The Kuomintang? The Russian Federation? What on Earth are you talking about, here? You'd rather live in societies with less freedom and lower quality of life metrics?

That's my point, even if communism was good, dictatorship is a plague that makes any system a nightmare.

You have no point, only vibes and a firehose of falsehood. Read Blackshirts and Reds.

[–] Funkytom467 -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry i'm harsh Cuba isn't quite a dictatorship i give you that one (Although not quite democratic either), maybe that could be a good study.

But saying Stalin or Mao are not dictatorships is just delusional.

The CIA as a source is pretty funny though.

I get it Stalin didn't quite have all powers, like that's what it took to classify a government a dictatorship. As if one-party system couldn't be complex.

(And yes socialist market economy, that really makes a world of difference from capitalist market)

Also to make things clear i wouldn't have sided with tsar or anyone else than Lenin. I do believe in communism.

Now some improvements may be from communism, i hope so, but don't pretend you can prove it more than i. It's not like life expectancy, literacy rate or other factors alike couldn't rise with another system. It's not like you could eliminate the possibility of third factors in a time with so much change in all areas of life.

But i sure wouldn't have followed Stalin in his totalitarian regime. I sure hope if communism was a solution today it would be democratic.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

But saying Stalin or Mao are not dictatorships is just delusional.

They weren't, Mao was democratically recalled, even. Stalin was elected as well, and neither had total control.

I get it Stalin didn't quite have all powers, like that's what it took to classify a government a dictatorship. As if one-party system couldn't be complex.

Is having a single party all it takes to not be democratic, in your eyes? Even if everything is decided democratically?

(And yes socialist market economy, that really makes a world of difference from capitalist market)

Yes, it absolutely does, which is why China has large public infrastructure projects, large levels of state planning, is beating climate goals, and has had climbing metrics for the proletariat, instead of falling metrics.

Also to make things clear i wouldn't have sided with tsar or anyone else than Lenin. I do believe in communism.

Yet you speak endlessly as a left anticommunist. Is the only communism you support the fictional kind in your fantasies?

Now some improvements may be from communism, i hope so, but don't pretend you can prove it more than i. It's not like life expectancy, literacy rate or other factors alike couldn't rise with another system. It's not like you could eliminate the possibility of third factors in a time with so much change in all areas of life.

These metrics rose with Communism and fell with Capitalism. It's cut and dry why they happened.

But i sure wouldn't have followed Stalin in his totalitarian regime. I sure hope if communism was a solution today it would be democratic.

The literal CIA didn't believe Stalin was totalitarian, and I proved it to be democratic with an infographic on how it functioned. You can even read Soviet Democracy by Pat Sloan to see how it functioned.

Please, read a history book instead of parroting state propaganda, and read Marx, Engels, Lenin, and other Marxists for theory, instead of wikipedia.