this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
340 points (92.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7186 readers
1259 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Missouri speaks for the entire US now?

[โ€“] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The US can be judged by the actions of any single state. It's all the same country ๐Ÿ™„

[โ€“] TheTechnician27 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The fact that the US federal government has the power to outlaw this but doesn't, that this specific execution was brought before the Supreme Court and they voted against blocking it 6โ€“3, and the fact that the majority of US states (27) and the federal government have this on the books speak for the US now, yes.

Taken to an absurd extreme, let's imagine that the US federal government and 27 of its states explicitly had statutes on the books stating "you can legally rape puppies", and you stepping in and saying "Well that doesn't speak for the entire US! Stop trying to make it sound like everyone condones puppy rape just because Missouri allows it!" Would you say that then? Because I feel like any rational person would be asking "Why does the US allow this to happen?" If not, why would you say it here? The US is simply backwards in this regard.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Sure, we'll pretend that this hasn't been happening here for hundreds of years across all 50 states.