Asklemmy

44119 readers

915 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Are modern LLMs closer to AGI or next word predictor? Where do they fall in this graph with 10 on x-axis being human intelligence. (programming.dev)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

94 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Wondering if Modern LLMs like GPT4, Claude Sonnet and llama 3 are closer to human intelligence or next word predictor. Also not sure if this graph is right way to visualize it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You're trying to graph something that you can't quantify.

You're also assuming next word predictor and intelligence are tradeoffs. They could as well be the same.

[–] trashgirlfriend 2 points 2 months ago

I agree, people who think LLMs are intelligent are as smart as phone keyboard autocomplete

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I took this as a way of measuring human opinions. Like when they ask you how much it hurts on a scale of 1 to 10.