this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
65 points (100.0% liked)

NASA

1007 readers
15 users here now

Anything related to the NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration); the latest news, events, current and future missions, and more.

Note: This community is an unofficial forum and is unaffiliated with NASA or the U.S. government.

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] NegativeInf 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Your comment vs the other response I got to this seem to clash.

And I am calling them as a whole orbital debris. Not what they may break up into.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I am calling them as a whole orbital debris

Ah, the term "orbital debris" refers to "defunct human-made objects in orbit which no longer serve a useful function". Operational satellites do not fall into this category.

As for aluminum oxide pollution in the stratosphere, that is a serious issue which SpaceX needs to address. However, I'm not sure that stratospheric pollution would fall under the jurisdiction of NASA's new orbital debris division.