this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
80 points (90.0% liked)

Technology

59674 readers
3211 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

citing the user's anonymous speech rights under the First Amendment.

Is there any validity to this theory?

I never heard anonymity being protected by 1st AM

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago

Accordingly, an author’s decision to remain anonymous, like other decisions concerning omissions or additions to the content of a publication, is an aspect of the freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment.

US Supreme Court, McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission (1995)

More:

https://epic.org/issues/democracy-free-speech/anonymity/

[–] lath 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A quick skim says anonymity is protected under it, with exceptions. Mostly for criminal acts. Particularly here, if the leaked artwork falls under "intellectual property" then the exception applies and anonymity isn't protected.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The regime works in mysterious ways

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

It's not mysterious, it's just capital